I spent the entire weekend indoors, in workshops mainly that
informed the attending students about just about anything on research. The
workshops were very comprehensive and detailed, containing ideas on good
research techniques, how to frame our research, to centralize our research
topic, etc., all of which re-energized my brain and triggered ideas on how to
further narrow down my topic.
Saturday seems like a blur now, but everything given was a mouthful and I had to go on one of my walks in order for the information to foment and be processed into something academic sounding. It came to me as I reentered the dirt trail leading to the parking lot behind Fergusson Halls. Happily, this refocusing of my research question has brought me closer to the central theme of my dissertation.
Sunday, today, was the final day. It wasn’t as long or as packed as Saturday, and the workshop sessions forced me to think about something that I hadn’t really incorporated into my other research endeavors: the self in relation to the subject. Here in New Zealand, they seem to encourage taking this factor into account. I think it challenges readers to think about the relationship between researcher and the studied, perhaps even encourages readers to ponder over whether or not this relationship is significant to achieving objectivity, if that makes any sense.
Saturday seems like a blur now, but everything given was a mouthful and I had to go on one of my walks in order for the information to foment and be processed into something academic sounding. It came to me as I reentered the dirt trail leading to the parking lot behind Fergusson Halls. Happily, this refocusing of my research question has brought me closer to the central theme of my dissertation.
Sunday, today, was the final day. It wasn’t as long or as packed as Saturday, and the workshop sessions forced me to think about something that I hadn’t really incorporated into my other research endeavors: the self in relation to the subject. Here in New Zealand, they seem to encourage taking this factor into account. I think it challenges readers to think about the relationship between researcher and the studied, perhaps even encourages readers to ponder over whether or not this relationship is significant to achieving objectivity, if that makes any sense.
I’ve heard this
comment over and over from various professors and researchers – no research is value free – but simply by acknowledging one’s
personal motivation, even one’s alliance with the subject matter in terms of shared
experiences or even something as superficial as appearances, the reader injects
objectivity into the way he/she receives the research findings. The reader is
forced to separate him/herself from the researcher, done so by discerning the
elements in the study that might be influenced by the researcher’s personal
relationship to them, and weighs them against other findings. Put another way,
the subjectivity of the researcher forces the reader to be more discriminating
about the findings exposited in the study.
At the end of the day, I went for my walk again, exploring
the trails winding uphill to . . . where? Somewhere.
I opted to follow the heritage trail, where I learned about
Morrow’s contribution to Massey University before continuing on to Collison
Road. I sighted cows, sheep, and the John Dyer residence hall. One cow’s udders
were so full that I was tempted to milk her to alleviate the extra weight I
knew she was carrying.
I marvel still at the similarity between the landscape surrounding the university and Sunderland. I appreciate the university’s connection to agriculture because I know how vital it is to feeding New Zealand’s population.
I marvel still at the similarity between the landscape surrounding the university and Sunderland. I appreciate the university’s connection to agriculture because I know how vital it is to feeding New Zealand’s population.